Head to head
Comparisons worth publishing.
Forty compounds make 780 possible pairings, and almost all of them would be the same page with two names swapped. These are the ones where the data actually differs: same class and same target, or the same primary goal reached two different ways. Every one ends in a written verdict, including the ones where the honest verdict is that there is no winner.
3 comparisons
GLP-1 / incretin
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
21 comparisons
GH secretagogue
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
6 comparisons
Healing & repair
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
10 comparisons
Metabolic
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
11 comparisons
Nootropic
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
1 comparison
Immune
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
3 comparisons
Cosmetic
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
6 comparisons
Other
Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.
21 comparisons
Across classes
Different mechanisms that get compared anyway, because they are pointed at the same goal. These are the ones most likely to end in "they do different things".
Deliberately absent
Compounds with no comparison page
4 compounds have no head-to-head page here, and that is the finding rather than a gap. Their own goal weightings never clear the threshold used to publish a pairing, which is this dataset saying there is no strong enough claim to hold up against anything else. The monographs still cover them.
Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.