Head to head
DSIP vs Ipamorelin
Two compounds that are more often stacked than compared — the side-by-side data, and what actually separates them.
Verdict
Not an either/or
What you are actually choosing between
Before anything else: the dataset lists DSIP and Ipamorelin in each other's stacks. They are run together more often than they are chosen between, so if you came here for a winner, the first honest answer is that this may not be an either/or.
These sit in different classes. DSIP is a nootropic; Ipamorelin is a growth hormone secretagogue. They get compared because of where they overlap, not because they are interchangeable.
The overlap is recovery and sleep. On this site's goal weighting — an editorial priority score, not a measure of effect size — DSIP rates 4/5 for recovery and sleep and Ipamorelin rates 4/5. Outside that overlap only Ipamorelin goes further, carrying weight for injury repair and muscle growth; DSIP's declared goals stop at the overlap.
The evidence
Neither has an evidence edge — both sit at the same tier. DSIP: some human data, but it is small, old, or uncontrolled; the controlled work is a handful of small studies from decades ago. Ipamorelin: some human data, but it is small, old, or uncontrolled; small early-phase work only; development was discontinued. Anyone telling you one is clearly better supported than the other is going beyond what is published.
How they differ in practice
DSIP is a subcutaneous injection and an intramuscular injection; Ipamorelin is a subcutaneous injection. Both are injected, so route does not decide this one.
Ipamorelin has a characterized half-life of 2 h; DSIP does not have one published here at all. That asymmetry is worth more than it looks — it usually tracks how much formal pharmacology has been done on a compound.
Committed time differs: DSIP runs 4 weeks, Ipamorelin runs 12 weeks.
Risk and difficulty
The contraindication lists are not the same: Ipamorelin flags active malignancy, which DSIP does not. If any of those describe you they remove a compound from consideration outright, regardless of everything above.
Ipamorelin is rated beginner here and DSIP intermediate. That rating is about how much can go wrong in handling, dosing and monitoring, not about how well either works.
Source notes
What the evidence actually says
Verbatim, so you can check the verdict above against what it was built from.
DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide)
DSIP is a nine-amino-acid peptide isolated in the 1970s by Monnier, Schoenenberger and colleagues from the cerebral venous blood of rabbits in electrically induced delta-wave sleep, which is where the name comes from. It is not approved anywhere and has no modern development program. The human evidence is old, small and sparse, and it does not show what the name implies. The controlled work is a handful of studies from roughly 1977 to the early 1990s, mostly with a few dozen subjects at most, and the effects on sleep architecture were modest and inconsistent between groups. Some of the more repeatable findings were not in insomnia at all but in chronic pain and in opiate and alcohol withdrawal. DSIP is not a sedative and does not behave like one: it does not reliably knock anyone out, and whether an injected dose crosses the blood-brain barrier intact in meaningful quantity is still disputed. Treat any claim of a strong hypnotic effect as unsupported. On dosing, the classic human studies gave roughly 25 nmol/kg intravenously - about 1.5 mg for a 70 kg adult - which is both a different route and a much larger amount than anyone injects subcutaneously today. That figure has deliberately NOT been used to set the ceiling here. The 100-500 mcg subcutaneous range with a typical dose around 200 mcg reflects contemporary community practice, taken shortly before bed; there is no trial behind that range, and no dose-response curve exists for this route. Plasma half-life is reported in minutes, so no hourly figure is listed. The four-week cycle length is convention rather than evidence - no study has run long enough to establish a course length, and nothing is known about tolerance or long-term use.
Ipamorelin
Selective ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) agonist that triggers a growth hormone pulse with little effect on cortisol or prolactin, which is the main reason it is chosen over hexarelin or GHRP-6. Published human work is limited to small early-phase and post-operative ileus studies; development was discontinued and it is NOT an approved medicine anywhere. Everything sold to consumers is research-chemical grade, so the community 100-300 mcg per dose range comes from practice rather than from a label.
Side by side
The numbers
| Attribute | DSIP | Ipamorelin |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Nootropic | GH secretagogue |
| Routes | Subcutaneous, Intramuscular | Subcutaneous |
| Dose range | 100 mcg–500 mcg (typical 200 mcg) | 100 mcg–300 mcg (typical 200 mcg) |
| Frequency | Once daily | Once daily |
| Half-life | Not characterized | 2 h |
| Cycle length | 4 weeks | 12 weeks |
| Experience | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Evidence | Limited human data | Limited human data |
| Contraindications |
|
|
| Side effects |
|
|
Turn a typical dose into a mark on the syringe: DSIPIpamorelin
Goals
Where they overlap, and where they do not
| Goal | DSIP | Ipamorelin |
|---|---|---|
| recovery and sleep | DSIP: 4/5 | Ipamorelin: 4/5 |
| injury repairone only | DSIP: — | Ipamorelin: 3/5 |
| muscle growthone only | DSIP: — | Ipamorelin: 3/5 |
| fat lossone only | DSIP: — | Ipamorelin: 2/5 |
| longevityone only | DSIP: — | Ipamorelin: 2/5 |
They overlap on 1 goal and diverge on 4. Weights are this site’s editorial priority score out of 5 — how central a goal is to why people use a compound. They are not effect sizes and two 5s do not mean two equal results.
Next
Go deeper
Related
Other comparisons with these two
Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.